I think it’s time to stop talking about the Trump
administration and start talking about the real power and vision behind the
current presidency, Steve Bannon. We
joke that he’s the puppet master pulling the strings, but it’s no joke.
He is, in effect, the shadow president, and this is his
administration, his grand plan. I don’t
mean as a mere strategist. I mean the
whole plan is his, including the goals, which means we need to focus on what he
believes and what he wants.
Steve Bannon’s worldview is anti-globalist. He admires right-wing nationalists,
law-and-order governments that maintain tight control of the people, and
hard-line opponents of immigration. He
has no qualms about leveraging Anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny, and Islamophobia
for political gain. Like his alt-right
compatriots, he views the enforcement of civil rights laws, environmental
policies, and all manner of business regulations as no mere inconvenience or
even government overreach, but as a form of tyranny. He views government as a win-lose endeavor,
and he intends to win no matter what it takes.
When we consider his views, the first round of executive
orders from this administration is not surprising. They are Bannon’s handiwork. The border wall, the immigration ban, the
death of the Affordable Care Act, and the rest of the odious orders thus far are
in alignment with Bannon’s worldview, but I would argue that they pale in comparison
to the sudden upheaval in the structure of government. This is Bannon’s real goal, and it should be
the big story.
What we’ve seen of this administration so far is not a mere
sea change in policy. Bannon seems to
want nothing less than a total transformation of our very form of government. That might sound extreme, but consider that more
than once, he has expressed a desire to completely bring down the entire
establishment. Bloomberg quoted him as saying
"I come from a blue-collar, Irish Catholic, pro-Kennedy, pro-union family of Democrats. I wasn't political until I got into the service and saw how badly Jimmy Carter f---ed things up. I became a huge Reagan admirer. Still am. But what turned me against the whole establishment was coming back from running companies in Asia in 2008 and seeing that Bush had f---ed up as badly as Carter. The whole country was a disaster."
"I come from a blue-collar, Irish Catholic, pro-Kennedy, pro-union family of Democrats. I wasn't political until I got into the service and saw how badly Jimmy Carter f---ed things up. I became a huge Reagan admirer. Still am. But what turned me against the whole establishment was coming back from running companies in Asia in 2008 and seeing that Bush had f---ed up as badly as Carter. The whole country was a disaster."
This quote strikes me as central to his ideology. What he sees as the breakdown of our society
is not the fault of any individual administration but the result of a flawed
system of government. A blowhard who
complains non-stop about the idiots in government no matter who’s in charge
isn’t unusual. But this one is now
directing the president, and if he has his way, his ideology will reshape the
American government completely, and our society along with it.
Toward the end of the campaign, Trump promised to drain the
swamp in DC. The crowd loved it. It became a rallying cry. We all expected to see an administration of
outsiders. So, as the transition team
took shape, and the cabinet picks were announced, we on the left jumped on the
list of elites, the party operatives, and Washington insiders Trump had chosen
and accused him of hypocrisy for not even trying to drain the swamp. On top of that, we argued, many of the picks
were undeniably unqualified.
We should have paid closer attention. The picks were not foolish. Even the cabinet nominees who are clearly
unqualified fit Bannon’s goal of upending the government.
Who better to take down the Department of Energy than the
man who said if elected president he would eliminate it altogether? Who better to gut the Department of Education
than a woman who believes in handing government funds in the form of vouchers
to companies and religious organizations that operate private and charter schools? Who better to ignore Housing and Urban Development
initiatives than a man who claims that ensuring access to basic necessities is
a form of slavery? Who better to yank the regulatory teeth out of the EPA than
a man who sued the agency repeatedly? I
could go on, but you get the picture.
After just one week, the path of destruction Bannon seems to
be plotting is impressive in its scope.
The upper echelons of the state department have been cleared of career
personnel. The work product of
scientists engaged in climate change research is largely considered to be at
risk of destruction. Programs across the
federal government are slated for elimination in a scorched earth strategy
General Sherman couldn’t match.
Bannon and company seem to be hurtling toward their goal of
dismantling the institutions of the federal government at a breakneck
pace. As fast as they’re moving, it
would be wise for us to consider what obstacles of resistance remain in their
path.
There are five variables in this equation, five entities that
play a role in determining the outcome – the three branches of government
(executive, legislative, and judicial), the press, and the people. Over the years, the balance shifted fluidly
from one entity to another, allowing power to flow in one direction and then
another, always searching for equilibrium. These five entities balance one
another, righting the ship of state as needed, keeping it from capsizing.
For Bannon to succeed, he has to capsize the ship.
He appears determined to consolidate power in a shrinking
executive branch that will be more tightly controlled by a small cadre of
like-minded crusaders who are beholden to no one but themselves.
The legislative branch is under the control of the
Republican Party, swept into power by a combination of Trump’s populist wave,
voter suppression, and gerrymandered congressional districts that all but
ensure republican control of a population that leans democratic. Despite their initial show of resistance to
Trump, they’ve largely caved in. Though
some of them surely object to Bannon’s vision and tactics, the specter of
battling both the administration and the voters back home keeps their mouths
shut. For the past few years they’ve
been like a pack of dogs chasing Obama’s car down the street, yapping and
snarling. Now, like the proverbial dogs
that eventually caught the car, they don’t know what to do with it, so they
gladly stand by and watch while Bannon hands Trump a sledgehammer and sends him
swinging at the windshield.
The press has been under attack from this administration
since before the election. Bannon’s team
has undermined the serious press and elevated both the egregiously slanted Fox
News and a number of even less responsible fringe organizations, his own
Breitbart among them. Any news coverage
they don’t like is simply labeled fake news.
If the administration dislikes the coverage, the offending journalists
are threatened. Bannon went so far as to
call the media the opposition party and say they should keep their mouth
shut. Meanwhile, the barrage of fake
news continues, and Trump’s followers gobble it up like candy.
This brings us to the judiciary, the branch of government
that presents the greatest roadblock to Bannon’s plan. With the executive branch already being
reshaped and the legislative branch largely brought to heel, the judiciary is
next on the hit list. Despite the vocal
complaints about Obama and the Congress, it’s the judiciary that Bannon’s crowd
truly hates. This is the branch that
holds the others two in check, especially with regard to civil rights, because
this is the branch that has the power to say no. When the courts rule that a law is
unconstitutional, that law cannot stand.
It is the courts that ensure our civil rights, the courts that protect
the individual from the state.
On the left, we admire the courts. Over the years, we’ve fought and won many
important battles in courtrooms. Our
civil rights movement has relied on the rule of law as interpreted by the
courts. But among Bannon’s crowd,
so-called activist judges undermine the system of government as they believe it
should operate. They frequently decry
the rulings we celebrate as being at odds with majority rule, which in their
eyes is not so different from mob rule.
The problem here is that the judicial branch has no power to
enforce their rulings. Have you ever
wondered what would happen if the executive branch simply refused to comply
with the judicial branch’s orders? I
believe we’re about to find out. This
past weekend, DHS agents in airports across the country defied a federal
court’s orders by refusing to allow detainees to speak to attorneys. What if this was just a trial balloon to see
what they could get away with? If so,
what’s coming next will be far more than a typical shift in the balance of
power among the branches of government.
Bannon would love to see the judiciary hobbled and unable to oppose the
administration on issues of civil rights and deregulation. We could be headed for a constitutional
crisis focused on the question of judicial power. In this context, Jeff
Sessions as attorney general is even more chilling.
That leaves only one entity standing in Bannon’s way – the
people, or at least some fraction of us.
That’s where the slew of executive orders comes in. Week one was designed to shock us, divide us,
and create chaos. The mess of the immigration
ban was not simply incompetent bungling.
It was designed to go badly. The
bigger the mess, the more adamant our protest.
Thousands of liberals chanting and shouting in defense of Muslim
immigrants and refugees sends quite a message to middle America Trumpville,
where people already conflate Muslims with terrorists and cautious foreign
policy with a lack of action. Liberals,
they claim, will risk the lives of every American to avoid hurting the poor
little feelings of a single terrorist. Divide
and conquer.
With each new outrage, we protest and demonstrate. The administration claims the protests are
small and insignificant, their media proxies belittle the protestors, and Fox
News blasts their talking points to Trumpville. Regarding the protests this
past weekend, Fox posted a piece with the headline “Forget the hysterical
mainstream media – America likes Trump’s agenda, including his immigration
pivot.” Their viewers roll their eyes at
us and buy coffee mugs from which they can sip liberals’ tears.
Before the latest outrage even dissipates, the cycle starts
again - Trump signs the next executive order, we erupt, they condemn. Lather, rinse, and repeat until our diverse
and unwieldy resistance coalition cracks under the weight of the chaos. That’s the plan. They will push us until we begin to fight one
another, or until a demonstration becomes a riot, which will be a convenient
excuse for a law and order crackdown.
This is what consumes us all. And yet, this past weekend, as our outrage surged
into public protests for the second time in a week, this time swirling into
airports as well as the streets, Bannon quietly replaced the chairman of the
joint chiefs on the national security council, a move that in normal times
would have grabbed the headlines.
Bannon is the architect of this new regime, this new world
order. He’s the mastermind, and Trump is
the stooge, the celebrity spokesman who entertains the crowd with the ideas and
words Bannon has fed him. This is not
Trump’s administration. It’s Bannon’s. We know who he is. What know what he wants. Just as Hitler laid out his plan in Mein
Kampf, Bannon has laid out his vision in articles and interviews over the
years. He wants to replace our system of
government with a more authoritarian regime in which the white nationalist mob
rules, and the rest of us know our place.
He will achieve these ends through lies, intimidation, and fearmongering. Can violence be far behind?
As the destruction of our institutions of government
continues, I have to ask, how far does it have to go before we begin calling it
a coup d’etat? I know, that sounds
crazy. It’s something we associate with
African warlord dictators and banana republics.
But coups don’t always involve the military and can be accomplished
without bloodshed.
If you’re shaky on what, exactly, a coup is, here’s the
Merriam-Webster definition.
Coup d'état: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics; especially: the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group
Coup d'état: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics; especially: the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group
Bannon was not elected to the presidency, but make no
mistake, he’s the one in charge. He’s
consolidating power in a small inner circle of the executive branch and
dismantling the checks and balances that would limit his control. Trump is merely the showman sent out to whip
up the crowds and divert our attention from what’s happening behind closed
doors. While Trump incites fear of
immigrants, Bannon quietly grabs more power.
It’s not the terrorists who are the greatest threat to the nation. It’s Steve Bannon.
Does it sound farfetched?
Maybe. But consider his own
words.
He told The Hollywood
Reporter,
"Darkness is good... Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That's power. It only helps us when they (liberals) ... get it wrong. When they're blind to who we are and what we're doing."
"Darkness is good... Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That's power. It only helps us when they (liberals) ... get it wrong. When they're blind to who we are and what we're doing."
We can’t afford to be blind.
We need to pay attention. What we’ve seen this past week is just the
beginning.